Discussing fees with your advisor should be part of any routine review of your financial plan. However, a recent survey by Cerulli Associates and Phoenix Marketing International found that nearly two out of three investors were confused about how they were paying their advisors. Another survey by investment management firm Rebalance IRA found that many Americans incorrectly believe they pay no fees in their retirement accounts. Additionally, a recent SEI survey of consumers showed that 38% of mass affluent consumers are “either wrong or confused” about how they compensate their advisor.1
The brokerage industry has spent years disguising fees, which partially accounts for the confusion some clients feel regarding financial advisor fees. Although many clients are uncomfortable discussing fees and asking how the advisor is compensated for services provided, it is important that your advisors provide clear, concise descriptions of how they are paid. If your advisor cannot clearly explain his or her fees and compensation, you should reevaluate the relationship.
This article examines the variety of ways brokers and their firms charge.
How Do Advisors Get Paid?
There are three primary ways financial advisors are compensated:
• Fee only: An advisory fee based on a percentage of assets under management. The advisory fee typically ranges from 0.5-2% of the amount invested; the rate is generally influenced by asset size and services provided.
• Commissions: A sales load or transaction fee tied to the product sold to the investor. The potential for a conflict of interest does exist. A broker could be tempted to recommend an investment offering the highest personal payout.
• Fee-based: Advisors receive compensation from either model. The advisor may choose which method of payment he or she prefers or could even provide the client with an option to determine how they would like to pay for advice.
Other than the fee your advisor charges, clients may be subject to additional fees. Thus, whether you utilize an advisor or not, you are likely paying several of the following fees:
Expense ratio: Mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and even no-load funds carry an expense ratio. This is generally a small percentage. Revenue-sharing arrangements may exist, particularly with discount brokerage firms. While the discount brokerage firms may charge a lower annual advisory fee, the true cost of the relationship may be similar or higher than the registered independent advisor model, particularly if the underlying investments consist of mutual funds.
• Transaction fee: Your account is charged every time you buy or sell. Such an arrangement is common in the traditional brokerage model. This charge is also known as a commission.
• Plan fee: Common in 401(k) or company sponsored retirement accounts, your plan provider may charge this fee for holding your assets or providing plan administrative services.
• Wrap fees: Prevalent in a brokerage model. A broker may invest your funds in a basket of individual stocks, and you will pay fees to a third-party manager. A portion of these expenses will be passed on to your advisor as compensation.
• 12b-1 fees: Assessed by a mutual fund, the fee provides compensation to a broker or brokerage firm and is paid directly from the fund company.
• Sales loads or redemption fees: Sales loads are taken from your initial investment and passed on to the broker. Back end redemption fees may be assessed when an investment is not held for a predetermined period. Redemption fees are typically attached to 12b-1 fees or a high expense class of mutual fund shares. The redemption charge is created to ensure a minimum rate of compensation for the broker, allowing the investor to bypass an upfront charge on the investment.
Understanding Fee Models
Because the various types of fees can be confusing, it may be helpful to walk through a few scenarios to compare and contrast the different models.
Example: Client A contacts his broker and expresses an interest in investing $50,000 in US growth stocks. The broker invests the client assets in Fund XYZ, which charges a sales load of 5.75% with operating expenses of 0.68% annually. The client will immediately pay a one-time fee of $2,875 on the trade on top of the recurring fund management fee. In this case, the suitability standard has been met. Client B contacts his Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) with the same request. The investment advisor purchases an ETF with a gross expense ratio of 0.18% and pays a commission of $8.95 on the trade. This client pays his RIA a management fee of 1% of the assets, which equates to $500 per year on $50,000. The advisor has met the fiduciary standard. In our very realistic example, the front-loaded fees paid by Client A are significant enough that it would require a commitment of approximately nine years to this fund family before that commission is equal to the sum of advisory fees paid by Client B.
Let’s look at another scenario to illustrate the difference between a brokerage model and a true fee-only model.
Example: Client A is approached by his broker to invest in a non-publicly traded real estate investment trust. The client sends in a check for $100,000, and the security is priced at $10 per share, thus the client receives 10,000 shares. The broker receives a 7% commission from the real estate investment trust sponsor. Client B is approached by his RIA to invest $100,000 in the same privately held real estate investment trust. The advisor charges a 1% management fee and does not accept compensation from the REIT sponsor. In this scenario, the commission is returned to the RIA client in the form of a reduced purchase price for the shares. Client B receives a discounted price of $9.30 from the sponsor and is able to purchase 10,752 shares of the same REIT with his $100,000 investment. Client A would be required to hold the investment for approximately seven years before his 7% commission matches the sum of fees paid by Client B to his advisor.
What about the discount brokerage model; how could a revenue sharing arrangement affect your cost of advice?
Example: Discount brokerage firm XYZ offers to manage client assets at a reduced cost of 0.80% of assets under management for Client A. The rep at XYZ purchases $150,000 of retail shares of a bond fund with an operating expense of 0.75%. The rep does not receive compensation for choosing this fund; however, his firm (XYZ) receives revenue sharing directly from the fund company. A registered investment advisor for Client B charges 1% for his services and purchases institutional shares of the same fund with an operating expense of 0.46%. Registered independent advisors often have access to the lower cost I shares offered by certain mutual fund families. In this scenario, the “discount” brokerage relationship results in a slightly higher cost to Client A because of hidden revenue sharing, despite charging a lower management fee for their service.
The comprehensive list of fees and expenses an investor could pay his or her advisor is extensive. It is easy to see why many investors are confused and frustrated with their attempts to determine the cost of their advisory relationship. A variety of online tools are available to help you understand the expenses associated with your underlying investments; however, if you are not familiar with industry jargon and investment terminology, you may become exasperated searching for the answers.
OJM Group’s Wealth Management Team is willing to perform a fee audit to provide an answer to the question: What am I paying my advisor, and is the amount reasonable? Leverage the resources of our team, and transform yourself into one of the few investors who know exactly what you are paying your financial professional.
Jason M. O’Dell, MS, CWM is a financial consultant and an author of more than a dozen books for physicians, including For Doctors Only: A Guide to Working Less & Building More. He is a principal of the wealth management firm OJM Group www.ojmgroup.com, where Andrew Taylor, CFP is a wealth advisor. They can be reached at 877-656-4362 or email@example.com.
1. Higher fees won’t spook most advisory clients: SEI. Think Advisor. http://www.thinkadvisor.com/2016/02/04/higher-fees-wont-spook-most-advisory-clients-sei#.VrpRXO1-tZc.twitter. Feb 4, 2016.
OJM Group, LLC. (“OJM”) is an SEC registered investment adviser with its principal place of business in the state of Ohio. OJM and its representatives are in compliance with the current notice filing and registration requirements imposed upon registered investment advisers by those states in which OJM maintains clients. OJM may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. For information pertaining to the registration status of OJM, please contact OJM or refer to the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure web site www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
For additional information about OJM, including fees and services, send for our disclosure brochure as set forth on Form ADV using the contact information herein. Please read the disclosure statement carefully before you invest or send money.
This article contains general information that is not suitable for everyone. The information contained herein should not be construed as personalized legal or tax advice. There is no guarantee that the views and opinions expressed in this article will be appropriate for your particular circumstances. Tax law changes frequently, and accordingly information presented herein is subject to change without notice. You should seek professional tax and legal advice before implementing any strategy discussed herein.
To receive free print copies of For Doctors Only: A Guide to Working Less & Building More and Wealth Management Made Simple please call 877-656-4362. Visit www.ojmbookstore.com and enter promotional code PRNEUR04 for a free ebook download of these books for your Kindle or iPad.